“Could a quantum computer have subjective experience?” by Scott Aaronson

People who are into physics and follow blogs actively have surely ran into MIT physicist Scott Aaronson, probably most well known for his critiques of the alleged D-Wave quantum computer. More recently, Scott has been writing a lot about consciousness, but his latest post – prepared talk notes from the Quantum Foundations of a Classical Universe meeting – is a real doozy.

The post is a long read, and here’s the juicy bit to entice you:

The intermediate position that I’d like to explore says the following. Yes, consciousness is a property of any suitably-organized chunk of matter. But, in addition to performing complex computations, or passing the Turing Test, or other information-theoretic conditions that I don’t know (and don’t claim to know), there’s at least one crucial further thing that a chunk of matter has to do before we should consider it conscious. Namely, it has to participate fully in the Arrow of Time. More specifically, it has to produce irreversible decoherence as an intrinsic part of its operation. It has to be continually taking microscopic fluctuations, and irreversibly amplifying them into stable, copyable, macroscopic classical records.

Before I go further, let me be extremely clear about what this view is not saying. Firstly, it’s not saying that the brain is a quantum computer, in any interesting sense—let alone a quantum-gravitational computer, like Roger Penrose wants! […]

Secondly, this view doesn’t say that consciousness is in any sense necessary for decoherence, or for the emergence of a classical world. I’ve never understood how one could hold such a belief, while still being a scientific realist. […]

Thirdly, the view I’m discussing doesn’t say that “quantum magic” is the explanation for consciousness. It’s silent on the explanation for consciousness (to whatever extent that question makes sense); it seeks only to draw a defensible line between the systems we want to regard as conscious and the systems we don’t—to address what I recently called the Pretty-Hard Problem. […]”


6 thoughts on ““Could a quantum computer have subjective experience?” by Scott Aaronson”

  1. not enough data ..this seems interesting .. do u have more?? i tried that link and it took me to a weird page ..

      1. Upon my return i shall read this and get my geek on. lol lol .. Thank u so much for replying. Yes interesting ..lollol

      2. Toma ..this article is like wtf? many apologies but it is more ramblings than anything .. do u have anything else i can read?? 🙂 thank u by the way ..

        1. It’s rather technical and philosophic, but does require quite a bit of background knowledge to fully appreciate. Wouldn’t call it a rant, though 🙂

          Nothing particular to recommend right now, but if you are interested in accessible science news, Nature News is a great source:

          1. Tomas i was mostly philosophic .. I prefer the pure technical aspects ..i like your blog .. 🙂 thank u by the way ..


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s